Introduction
Culture
defines the essence of the organization
in any business setting. It identifies
the physical interface and emotional temperament
between all employees. Culture also spans
the interaction of employees with customers, vendors, investors, and media. With the ever
changing business environment, businesses change their culture to adapt to the environment.
(Colin, 2012) In the
long run, organizations
can only succeed when they can adapt
to new demands and conditions. This
paper compares and contrasts the
models of culture in three international mobile manufacturing companies namely, Samsung, Apple and Huawei
to ascertain the most appropriate model.
It then recommends
the most appropriate
economic system that best relates to each
of the researched international competitors and their potential effects on such economic
systems. Additionally, it
will provide the major reasons why
certain countries have lagged behind other countries in economic development.
Samsung
Samsung
is the world’s second-largest
producer of mobile phones. The most
distinct characteristic of this company’s management
is the top-down approach used in decision-making. There is no
doubt that relations
take a significant position in the running of the company. The
organization model is simply to vertically structured and
too hierarchical. The nature of the centralized management is highly influenced
by the Eiffel Tower culture and Family culture. (Dongyoup, 2006)
The rigid corporate culture has brought a high level of hierarchy and bureaucracy and
a very formal relationship among management and employees compared
to Apple Inc and Huawei.
Apple
Apple Inc. is a global electronics manufacturing company whose culture
has been based on an ideal that self-motivated individuals
work best when
the management does not micromanage every action. This unique
structure has allowed it to grow and
react more quickly
to changes compared to most of its competitors. This is the
reason behind the innovative aspect that results from the quick responsiveness of individuals. It is easier to get a project
started when only a few people
are required to approve.
Decision-making happens at the
lowest possible level while the high-level management makes policy
and oversees all activities. The day-to-day decisions on the ground are made by employees. The top-down philosophy allows rapid flexibility
and responsiveness to situations
due to the less bureaucratic structures. (Jason, 2009)
Huawei
Huawei
took 16 years to become the largest
private high-tech enterprise
in China. Huawei’s unique corporate culture
and human resource
management have given the company
a superior competitive edge. The management
ideas of Ren Zhengfei underlie
Huawei’s excellent corporate culture.
Ren Zhengfei created the impressive management model that Huawei has today by combining successful management philosophies from renowned multinationals with the characteristics of the local environment and people. The
culture of Huawei calls for self-criticism by making it a part of employees’
regular evaluation. This helps the
company to receive a strong and
critical feedback from employees
including senior managers. The organization
culture releases some authority to employees and rebuilding
a creative organizational structure.
Discipline and the ability to make
decisions is down the chain of command. (Shan, 2012)
Economic system that best relates to each of the firms
The
main types of economic systems are traditional, command and mixed economic
systems. The command economic system
best relates to Samsung
Company. The most distinct feature of command economic system
is centralized control. The control is left in the hands of a centralized power often the
government. The government in this system regulates the
resources and makes central decisions.
Traditional
economic system best relates to Huawei Company. One
of the elements of the traditional economic
systems is that products and services
produced are a direct result of traditions, beliefs, customs and
religion. Huawei has today combined successful management philosophies from renowned multinationals with the characteristics of the local environment and people.
The
mixed economic system best relates
to Apple Inc. It combines the elements of market
and command economy. Some level of control is left in the hands
of the central authorities; however, many economic decisions are made by the
individuals in the market. The
government plays the role of allocating
and distributing resources. In Apple Inc. Decision-making happens
at the lowest level possible while the high-level management makes policy
and oversee all activities. The day-to-day decisions on the ground are made by employees.
Major reasons why certain countries
have lagged behind other countries in economic development
Economists
recognize that human and physical
capital and environmental resources are important economic assets known as natural capital. These
resources have a significant role in economic development of different countries. Empirical evidence and economic theories
and have shown
that
Income economies endowed with abundant natural resources develop more rapidly compared to economies with the relatively poor resource. Resource abundant economies reinvest the rents generated from natural resource exploitation into other productive assets. They are also more flexible in diverting the economic resources to and from more productive and innovative sectors. Other factors such as political climate, economic systems, war and stability of government also determine the rate of economic development in these countries. Economic growth concerns the increase in the market value of the goods and services that an economy produces. The three firms have a role to play in the economic development in their respective countries. One of the production factors in economics are labor and technology. Given their positions in the technological industry, the companies can invest heavily in human capital to promote economic development. This way, they can directly and indirectly promote innovation as well as create employment.
Income economies endowed with abundant natural resources develop more rapidly compared to economies with the relatively poor resource. Resource abundant economies reinvest the rents generated from natural resource exploitation into other productive assets. They are also more flexible in diverting the economic resources to and from more productive and innovative sectors. Other factors such as political climate, economic systems, war and stability of government also determine the rate of economic development in these countries. Economic growth concerns the increase in the market value of the goods and services that an economy produces. The three firms have a role to play in the economic development in their respective countries. One of the production factors in economics are labor and technology. Given their positions in the technological industry, the companies can invest heavily in human capital to promote economic development. This way, they can directly and indirectly promote innovation as well as create employment.
Given
an opportunity to lead one of
the organizations, I would choose to lead Samsung Electronics.
There are numerous skills
that I would require as a manager
to accomplish what is needed to get to that
position. This is informed by the rigid structure
of the firm that has been seen to affect the
organization’s flexibility in
the rapidly changing environment. Some management skills
can be learned informally
through life experiences, however, others have to be learned theoretically and developed through formal training
I will require investing in education to attain the necessary knowledge and skills for the position. In addition
to a set of skills, I will need to put into practice
some basic values
of building a relationship. These values will be helpful to ensure that I will be able to project attitudes of respect, cultural sensitivity and empathy
toward others.
As
the CEO, the first goal would be to look at the human
resource aspect of the organization. It is critical to involve all levels of employees in the decision-making process. It is important to identify that a company
employee are its most valuable assets along with the customers. This will enhance the ability to engage
in core mandates of
creativity and innovation
that are imperative in this industry.
References
Shan
Yingguang (2012) corporate culture at Huawei
Colin
Hawes (2012) The Transformation of Corporate Culture Routledge
Dongyoup
Lee (2006) Samsung Electronics: The Global Inc LEE
Dongyoup
Jason D. O'Grady (2009) Apple Inc ABC-CLIO
Carolyn Morgan is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in college research paper services. If you need a similar paper you can place your order from best medical essay service.
No comments:
Post a Comment