Persuasive Research Paper

The conclusions of the firearm misuse debates have never concluded in a uniform agreement, and on most occasions they end up in serious injuries and on occasion’s deaths causing a major heartache among the Americans. The majority of the American who own guns decide to use them mainly for recreation purposes and on the other occasions other deem it fit to further their criminal endeavors using the same firearms. It leads to the point of disagreement by those who feel its right to own firearms and use them for their recreational purposes while due to the harmful use of the firearms, others are opposing the ownership. As a result of the fierce arguments by pro firearm ownership and firearm ownership Americans, there is an increased appeal for the government to regulate the use of firearms. Due to the massive nature of the disagreement by those for and against firearm ownership, it is only justified if we considered whether the legislation is regulating gun use was going to produce the desired outcome. The common idea is that even with the legislation regulating the ownership and use of the guns; it is not going to have an effect in terms of the overall crime rate.     

The gun debate has been ongoing for decades with those advocating their use for personal protection while opposes there should be additional gun laws to monitor their use and protect the common citizen. Whether the gun laws have any significant in the reduction of the crime rate is an issue under discussion since the available data on the subject is not conclusive. The ten states that over time have passed the CCW laws do not have any significance of the laws in terms of reducing the trends in ownership of firearms.          

Using the study conducted by Mark Duggan in the year 2001 and assesses the in-depth outline of the erroneous beliefs relating to the effects as a result of gun control. Duggan in his study says that on the occasion that the option of varying a gun did increase the notion of benefiting due to the ownership, the resultant effect is that more people would own the guns. Even though the perceived benefits from gun ownership should lead to the increase in the number of individuals owning the gun, the passage of the CCW laws has resulted in no increase in the fraction owning the guns. Between 1985 and 1991, ten states have passed the CCW legislation and have consequently recorded just a 2% in the population owning guns. Additionally the near stagnation in the number of people owning guns additionally did not have any effect on the crime rate as the crimes committed with guns did not subside. The CCW laws that were believed to regulate the models of gun control, as well as the promotion, have a diminutive impact on the elements that shows the direction to follow addressing the ownership argument.       

One needs to examine consequently the alternative regions that have the strictest laws and determine whether having a hard-line legislation is the answer to the elimination of the negative results in the use of firearms. Another study assesses Scotland, which has a total ban on the ownership of firearms, has the highest rate of homicide that is above the international average. Thus, it leads to the notion that having strict gun laws additionally do not offer an answer in the deterrent of the harms that result from the illegal firearm use.          

The fact that judicial legislations are not offering a solution to the effective utilization of guns desired lead to the assertion that analyzing the individuals committing the crimes would possibly offer an answer. In a study that is in the British medical journal, results indicate that almost 50% of the youths convicted of violent gun crimes were from single parent homes. Additionally young men have been expelled from their previous schools on more than one occasion. Thus, the idea that comes to mind is whether the crimes associated with guns are like a resulted on the individuals possessing them being socially disconnected. Thus considering that there are other reasons other than legislations regulating the misuse of firearms, where should we then invest our resource? On numerous occasions, the society has been proactive when dealing with sensitive negative issues affecting the members. Should the society had taken the time to examine the individuals involved in the crimes through identifying those at risk, the acts could have prevented before they happened.          

The majority of the citizens who are against any firearm regulation base their argument on the bill of rights second amendment. The interpretation of the amendment has always been subjective depending on whether the individual is either for or against gun control. The argument against the regulation using the amendment should be in terms of the time of its implementation as well as the individual implementing the amendment.    

Issues of the best model in the context of satisfying the argument for or against should never be addressed using the individual preferences in the argument. As Americans, we should utilize our intellect and free nature taking our experience as a society and upon assessing our individual agendas, decide on what is best for all the inhabitants. The acquisition of anything by a single individual should never be given preference over the possible negative outcomes that could result from misusing firearms. The health of every other American should be given prominence to any value of right and individual could be possessing. Should everyone take a neutral position avoiding any political loyalties, then w could have a productive communication on the way forward on the settling of the debate.           

Taking all elements into consideration in terms of both legal as well as social prescriptions, we shall ne in a position to take a position and settle the matter fairly. My opinion is that the treatment of the instrument as being an issue instead of looking at the individual using the instrument results in a flawed conclusion. Since we already have the guns, has our perception of safety increased? I would be more contented when as a society we have tried all the possible solutions before we result in the legislation against guns. On the occasion that we were to spend more of the time studying and focusing on the primary issues leading to violence instead of trying to decipher what the second amendment interpreted. Through this analysis, the perception, as well as the enjoyment safety in the world, would be more sustainable.

Carolyn Morgan is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in paper college 24/7. If you need a similar paper you can place your order from custom nursing papers.