Asbat-al-Ansar
is a Lebanon-based a Sunni extremist group that is principally composed of
Palestinians who have links to Osama bin Laden al-Qaida organization along with
the other Sunni extremist groups. The founder of the group was a Palestinian
refugee as well as preacher Sheik Hisham Sheridan, who died in the year 1991
after an attack by their rival’s al-Fatah. Estimations indicate that the group
has a membership of between 100 and 2000 fighters. Most of the funding that the
group receives is through the international Sunni extremist networks (Chalk,
2012). Additionally, there are numerous security agencies who believe that the
group has a strong link with al-Qaida, from whom they have been receiving
significant funding. The group traditionally targets the Lebanese state along
with the elements of the foreign influence that are within the country.
The
group has previously been involved in a failed assassination attempts including
one on the American ambassador, Ukrainian consulate general, the Italian embassy
along with the Lebanese government offices. The group used to rocket attacks on the
Russian embassy as well as on the Hariri affiliated Future TV in Beirut (Chalk,
2012). One major US target that Asbat-al-Ansar could consider valuable is the
US embassy in Lebanon and the consequent ambassador along with the American
citizen working at the embassy. The US has been one of the major supporters of
the Lebanese government fights against the extremists groups in the region with
Asbat-al-Ansar being of the targets. Considering that the group has a
considerable dominance in the country as well as the fact that it is the only
target that Asbat-al-Ansar can organize attacks due to the proximity, the
embassy is their easiest target for any possible attack (Gleis & Berti,
2012).
Asbat-al-Ansar
would find the target valuable for some reasons. One of the reasons is the fact
that the US has been a major supporter of the country’s war against
Asbat-al-Ansar, whereby the group has suffered major casualties. Thus attacking
the embassy would be a good way for the group to attain revenge for the
attacks. Additionally, it could attack the embassy as a strategy to deter any
other country that wishes to destabilize the group’s influence in the region.
The fact that the embassy is well protected implies that the group can only
attack from far if they do not want to suffer heavy casualties. Thus, it would
involve the use of rocket attacks on the embassy (Paul, n.d). The additional strategy that the groups could
use is using suicide bombers to carry explosive on successful turns to breach
the security barrier at the embassy.
One
countermeasure that the US could use is setting a barrier around the embassy
that would make it hard if not impossible for Asbat-al-Ansar to attack without
being seeing. Establishing a buffer zone whereby no building can be built
around the embassy will assist in reducing the likelihood that the groups will
attack. Recruiting spies to infiltrate the group and inform on all the
activities the grouse wants to undertake will be vital in ensuring that the
embassy is well prepared for the event that there is an imminent attack
(Hunsicker, 2008). Additionally, reinforcing the barrier around the embassy and
deploying more security officers to man the perimeter around the clock is an
exceptional strategy of averting any possible attack before it happens.
The
recovery strategy will involve the diverse department in the homeland security
working together to address the situation and consequently ensure that all the
operations resume within the shortest duration possible. It will start with the
secretary sanctioning the executive secretary and the military advisor to a
crisis meeting. In this meeting, there will be the activation of the
directorate of national protection and programs, chief financial officer, a
federal emergency unit as well as the transportation security administration.
These departments will work together to ensure that all the officials in the
embassy are rescued and accounted for. They will additionally work to ensure
that the embassy activates an alternative are that the critical operations
continue taking place. Funds to hire additional staff if needed will
additionally be availed in addition to ensuring that the injured and
traumatized individuals are transported back home (Powne, 2006). The
departments will be involved in the development of a caretaker management
system in Lebanon to guarantee that there will be no disruption in the flow of
operations in the alternative areas that have been activated.
Conclusion
Asbat-al-Ansar
as one of the FTO poses major threats to the residents of Lebanon as well as
interests of the US in the regions. The continued funding additionally offers
them the backing they need to continue reigning havoc in the regions along with
the interest of the foreign powers in the country. It is thus imperative that
the assessment of the Asbat-al-Ansar encompasses the assessment of the specific
sources of funds and ensuring that these channels are obliterated as it is the
only way to ensure that they cannot recruit new members.
References
Chalk,
P. (2012). Encyclopedia of Terrorism [2 volumes]. ABC-CLIO
Gleis
, T. Berti, B. (2012). Hezbollah and Hamas: A Comparative Study. JHU Press
Hunsicker
, A. (2008). Understanding International Counter Terrorism.
Universal-Publishers
Paul,
L. (n.d). U.S. goes after 3 more terror groups' assets. USA Today,
Powne,
D. (2006). Critical Infrastructure Protection: Department of Homeland Security.
DIANE Publishing.
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in research paper company if you need a similar paper you can place your order for pre written essays.
No comments:
Post a Comment