Introduction
The
usage of technology in the workplace is bringing new concerns both for the
employers as well as for the employees. It goes without saying that use of
technology in the workplace is helpful in the reduction of operating costs as a
result of the reduction of operating costs. The technology usage in the
workplace ought to make things better than they are, but there has been rising
concern among the employees regarding the invasion of their privacy especially
when the usage of that technology interferes with their privacy. Because of
that invasion the employers are having resistance to the use of technology
especially when the employers use it to track them. It is because many at times
there is no agreement between the employers and the employees before they can
begin to use the monitoring technology as in the case study in question. The
paper, however, presents reasons that support the usage of this monitoring
technology in the workplace.
Pick
one of the preceding cases and create an argument on behalf of the employer's
use of monitoring technologies.
There
are numerous reasons that they employers have for using the monitoring
technology in the workplace monitor the employee behavior. Furthermore the
monitoring talks for the common good of the employer and the employee. Many
times in the race to solve one problem another one may arise in the process.
One of the reasons why I would support the employer in the in the case study in
question for using the monitoring technology is that the employer is using it as
a technique for better management of the organization. The employer uses it also to ensure there is
a high-quality customer service, and that helps to ensure that the employees
remain productive through the use of objective feedback (Lund, 1992). It is also
worth noting that the reason for the exits since of any business is because of
the presence of employees. Otherwise, a business may not be existent.
The
employer wants the customers to feel that they receive satisfactory services
from the organization the employer can do everything possible so as to meet the
needs of customers. In that sense, the employer is also taking care of the
employees because there can be no work for them to do without they clients
being there. So the monitoring is also taking place to benefit the employees in
another sense. When the employees are aware that there is monitoring of their
work taken place, they can increase their efforts and hence improved the
productivity of the organization. Studies also show that electronic monitoring
can decrease downtime of employees during the workday. Monitoring can also
discourage extended breaks as well as the use of company resources for personal
matters.
The
monitoring is also vital for employers as it gives them a clear picture of the
employees that are hard working and thus productive and those that are not
productive (Weckert, 2005). It is this objective feedback of employee
performance that can help during the performance of appraisals, evaluation of
training [performance effectiveness and determining raises as well as
promotions. The employer also uses this feedback to decide on the disciplinary
measures where it seems necessary. Many organizations that use objective
feedback in ensuring quantitative measurements of performance are certain that
they cannot have a bias in giving promotions. It is a good thing for the
employer to use this monitoring technology I the workplace because the
employers can see the good things and the bad ones after which he can act
accordingly.
Monitoring
also will help the employer to keep pace with his competitors because it is the
only way that ensures that the employees perform at their optimum levels
(Weckert, 2005). Monitoring is an indispensable means that the employer can use
not only to enhance the productivity of employees but also to assure the
quality of the productivity. The employer can use it to get vital information
concerning phone calls, how long some communication took pace, and how many
times an employee made certain calls.
That is helpful in ensuring that there is accountability on the side of
employees and that the employees are efficient and effective in their duties
(Schultz, 1994). The employer also has a right as well as a responsibility of
protecting his legitimate business interests in using the monitoring technology
I workplace. Monitoring will help the employer to avoid theft, increase safety,
hold down costs and boost productivity.
Monitoring
of worker is very helpful to the employer also because the employer can
investigate industrial espionage so that he can protect his trade secrets in an
effective way. If the employer cannot protect those company secrets, they not
are secrets any longer, and the company is likely to lose to its competitors.
Also, many employees do like using company resources to carry out unauthorized
business and when the company gives them computing power they can develop
essential software or even carry out their own business. The monitoring also
can help in protecting the property of both the employer and employees (Tavani,
2011). When the employers have their property within the premises of the
company, for instance, video surveillance can be helpful to them by ensuring
that their property such as vehicles is safe.
It
is good also for the employer to monitor the employees for any signs of
wrongdoing because the employer is the one who will be responsible for the
mistakes that the employees make in the long run. For instance, the owner of
the email bears the responsibility of any email sent where it is personal or
business. If an employee may be storing some pornographic materials on his/her
hard drive, or in case an employee may be using some software that is not
licensed; it can expose the company to copyright infringement claims (Casser,
1996). Many of the highlighted situations above do expose they employer to
liability and thus calling for the need to have surveillance and protection of
the company information and assets.
Conclusion
The
paper presents various reasons as to why the employer in the case study
provided should monitor their employees. The monitoring as highlighted in the
paper is essential for both the employer and the employee. Without monitoring
the employers will not be productive enough as they ought to. That is because
they will use much of their time doing activities that otherwise may not be of
any benefit to the company. It makes the employees responsible for their
actions and that the employer is not causing to bear the consequences of
irresponsible actions done using the company resources. When the employees know
that their employer is monitoring them, they can tailor their efforts towards
the common objective of improve the productivity of the company and increasing
the company’s competitiveness.
References
Casser, K. L. (1996).
Employers, employees, e-mail and the internet. The Internet and business: A
lawyer's guide to the emerging legal issues. Computer Law Association, Inc.
Lund, J. (1992).
Electronic performance monitoring: A review of the research issues. Applied Ergonomics,
23(1), 54--58.
Schultz, E. E.
(1994). Employee
beware: The boss may be listening. The
Wall Street Journal.
Tavani, H. T.
(2011). Ethics and technology: Controversies, questions, and strategies for
ethical computing. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley.
Weckert, J.
(2005). Electronic monitoring in the workplace: Controversies and solutions.
Hershey, PA: Idea Group Pub.
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in assignment writing services if you need a similar paper you can place your order from essay writing services.
No comments:
Post a Comment