The
taxes that are levied on goods, as well as services, lead to harm in addition
to distorting the effective operation of a country’s economy and in that case,
need not be levied. The attribute of economic efficiency addresses the manners
in which countries maximize the use of economic resources that are at their
disposal. The traditional economic resources encompass land, capital as well as
labor, with the concept of efficient operations of an economy being a regular
discussion topic for the different economies all over the world. Through the
assertions put forward by the Keynesians, the common premise is on the
discretionary policies that normally advocate for the employment of monetary or
fiscal policies as the primary basis for the management of the economy (Akila,
2009).
On
the tougher hand, the classical economists hold a different position, offering
the suggestion that it is always imperative that the economy is left on its
own, allowed to operate by itself. The classical view is the overall proposition
that I will be observing in this discussion. I agree with the position that the
taxes possess a distorting effect on the efficient operations of the economy
and thus need to be levied to curtail this ineffectiveness (Grigor'eva &
Khailov, 2014). Taxes fall under the classification of fiscal policies, and the
objective of levying the taxes is to impact the consumption of the citizenry
and is dependent on the health of the country’s economy.
In
this case, the taxes have a direct impact on the demand for services and
product in any given economy. In the event, there is an increase in the tax
levied on a product in the form of the value added tax; the most likely
situation is that the demand relating to the specific product is going to
decrease. The additional impact of the increase in tax of products is that it
results in the reduction of the real income of the population in that economy
as most of their earning are used in paying for the taxes levied on the
products they use (Potter, 2005). The increase in the tax has the consequent
impact of curtailing the purchasing power of the citizenry on any given
economy, in addition to the fact that it adversely affects the disposable
income of the population in the region. The reduction in income makes it
imperative that the potential customers to prepare a scale of preference
whereby certain goods are given preference over others as they are considered
to be essential than the others. A similar case is seen for the diverse goods
in that the population of a certain region is compelled to make investments
relying on the inferior necessity (Norris, 2014). The fact that no taxes will
be levied implies that the demand for the products and services in the economy
is going to be determined by the efficiency of the free discretionary policies
that dictate efficiency on the operation of the economy.
The
additional adverse impact that the levying of taxes has relates to the supply
concept, following the common trend where raw materials as well as other
production factors that facilitate the production of goods, as well as
services, are levied taxes. The imposition of taxes on the production means has
the overall effect of increasing the costs of production, which directly
impacts the supply of the products. The most common trend is whereby the
producer instead of the supplier decides to maintain the supply of the products
while passing the tax burden to the consumers by increasing the prices of their
products (Excise taxes, 2015). In that case, the tax impact on the production cost
will have an indirect impact on the consumers.
The tax attribute is an additional factor taken into consideration about
the issue of promoting the efficiency of their economy in that it determines
the amount of tax an individual pays for a certain product. In the event the
demand is more elastic than the supply, it follows that there is a high
likelihood that the consumer is going to incur the tax burden.
Conversely,
when there is less elasticity in the supply, it is common that the supplier of
the goods and services will incur the taxation costs as the consumer is not
able to pay more for the product or service. It falls under the discretion of
the seller to increase the prices of his products in an effort to accommodate
the tax burden (Akila, 2009). The overall attribute is that the elasticity of
the product defines the willingness of the buyer to accommodate the high price,
which results from the shifting tax burden. The possibility of the availability
of substitutes impacts the operations of the economy’s efficiency about the
subject of taxes. In this case, the overall premise is that the effect of
demand and supply being reliant on the diverse choices available to the
consumers. On those occasions that there is an increase in taxes affecting a
certain product, the consumers will start looking for alternatives that have
lower costs. If the alternative is available, the consumers will not be willing
to purchase the original product that has inflated prices. Conversely, if there
are no alternatives, the consumers may not have an option but to accept to buy
the product that has hiked process (Akila, 2009).
References
Akila,
W. (2009). Principles of Microeconomics: Global Financial Crisis Edition.
Chicago: Cengage Learning Press.
Excise
taxes. (2015). Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th Edition, 1.
Grigor'eva,
E., & Khailov, E. (2014). On Chattering Solutions for the Maximum Principle
Boundary-Value Problem in the Optimal Control Problem in Microeconomics. Computational
Mathematics & Modeling, 25(2), 158-168.
doi:10.1007/s10598-014-9216-3
Norris,
F. (2014, April 12). Total Taxes on Wages Are Rising. New York Times. p.
B3.
Potter,
M. (2005). State Taxes in Serious Need of Reform. Policy, 21(2),
21-27.
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in research paper services if you need a similar paper you can place your order for professional research proposal writing services.
No comments:
Post a Comment