Friday, December 21, 2018

Role of Colony Integration in Metabolic Scaling of Colonial Animals


Research Summary
            Metabolic scaling refers to the change in physiological process in proportion to body size. The measures of metabolic rate integrate different functions performed by animals. For colonial animals, their metabolic allometry has been hypothesized to be different from unitary animals. For instance, unitary organisms can be modeled a sphere with volume increasing more rapidly than surface area. Colonial organisms can be modeled as a cylinder with r >> h (r = radius, h = height).Consequently, in the later, surface area increases in proportion to volume. Thus, they might exhibit isometric scaling of metabolism. The animals can increase their total biomass beyond the environmental constraints operating on their modules. The research proposal includes a background discussion of metabolic scaling law as well as colony integration. The proposed work utilized two colonial species that differ in colony integration. Sympodium is a “distributed” colony, using cilia to propel its gastrovascular fluid and obtaining food from symbiotic dinoflagellates. Hydractinia is an “integrated” colony, consuming prey with large centrally located polyps and using muscular contractions to pump food-rich gastrovascular throughout the colony periphery. Measures of oxygen metabolism versus size will test the effects of integration and geometry.

Introduction
            The constraints in physiological rates of animals as evident in metabolic allometry describe a disproportional relationship between body size and basal metabolic rate. The relationship is described using a power functionY = YoMb . Metabolic allometry occurs when the scaling coefficient, b, is not equal to 1, and the mass-specific metabolic rate changes as the body size increases. The empirically measured value of scaling coefficient approaches 0.75 in different animals, and many theories help to explain the dominance of ¾ scaling across different sizes. The different theories predict a scaling exponent of 0.75, or 0.67, or 0.86 depending on the assumptions applied for two-dimensional organisms like colonial animals. There is an alternative view of metabolic scaling that proposes a range of scaling exponents predicted using surface area, and mass (Hulbert, 2014).
            Colonial animals are expected to deviate from negative allometry because their structures exhibit modular iteration. Their shape can be modeled as a cylinder with r >> h, Thus, isometric scaling where the scaling exponent is 1 of the colony metabolic rate and mass is predicted as an emergent property of modularity. The colony metabolic rate is a linear function of the number of component modules. For colonial organisms, the metabolic turnover rates like growth and reproduction converge towards isometric scaling (Hartikainen et.al., 2014).    
            Size can be easily manipulated in colonial organisms. The body size is an influential variable measured to understand the inter-specific variability in the metabolic requirements. Metabolism refers to the rate at which an organism exchanges and transforms resources from the environment. The main issue on the study of body size and metabolism has always been how metabolic rate changes with the size of the organism. The changes could have a basis on a broad category of measures that include length, surface area, and mass. The change in the size of an organism is the change in scale. The metabolic scaling theory has interrelated concepts and empirical observations that help to create links between different levels of the organism in biology and ecology. The theory attempts to provide a unified theory to understand metabolism as a driving pattern and process in biology from the cellular level to the biosphere (White & Kearney, 2014). 
Background

Geometry:
            The metabolic scaling law is an extension of Kleiber’s law that posits that the metabolic rate of organisms is the basic biological rate that explains many of the observed patterns in ecology. Metabolic scaling theory attempts to offer a unified theory for the importance of metabolism in driving the pattern and process in biology (Agutter & Tuszynski, 2011). Allometry is a technique previously used to analyze the relative growth and showed basal metabolic rates to vary with the 0.73-0.74 power of the body mass (Glazier, 2014). It usually follows a power function: Y = YoMb where Y= a measure of metabolic rate, Y0= normalization constant, M= body mass or some other size measure and b = allometric scaling coefficient (the slope after log-log transformation).
Y = YoMb
Kleiber suggested the use of mass ¾ due to its easy calculation with a slide rule. However, there have been other scaling exponents ranging from 0.80 to 0.97 and the scaling of mammalian metabolic rate during growth displaying multi-phasic allometric relationships with scaling components more than ¾. The relative tissue size is crucial in the determination of metabolic rate.      
The 3/4 exponent is found only in resting metabolic rate. Higher levels of metabolic activity produce higher exponents. Many researchers accept the reality of allometric scaling but contend with the basal metabolic rate being 0.75 (Farrell-Gray & Gotelli, 2005). The skeptics claim that the true value is 0.66 or 0.67 since the principal determinant of metabolic scaling is a surface-to-mass ratio.
Allometric metabolic scaling implies that bigger animals have a different metabolic rate per unit mass as compared to smaller organisms. The metabolic rate of animals gets measured as the rate at which an animal uses oxygen or produces carbon dioxide. When oxygen is present, gas exchange is not a problem for small animals due to their high surface-to-volume ratio.
The relationship between metabolic rate and body mass has been well-studied in biology due to several factors. This relationship among species is interpreted as a primary constraint by which ecological processes, from individuals to ecosystems, aregoverned. The second aspect is that there is still considerable debate over the exact value and mechanistic basis of exponent b (Glazier, 2005). The basic principle for whole-organism metabolic allometry is that the volume, hence the body mass, of cells converting energy increases faster than the total effective surface area across which energy and material resources get exchanged with the external and internal environment as animals continue to grow.
The mechanistic theories have different assumptions concerning the flow and partitioning of assimilated energy into and through an animal. The West, Brown, and Enquist (WBE) model, for instance, makes the assumption that the entire animal metabolic rate gets limited by the internal transport of resources through a volume filing, hierarchical, fractal-like, pathway. The Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) model, on the other hand, is based on surface area to volume relationships that determine the uptake ad use of food and oxygen. The Metabolic-Levels Boundary (MLB) model makes the assumption that the energy utilization and power generation for an activity are limited by volume and scale isometrically with mass while fluxes of metabolic resources, wastes, and heat get limited by surface area and scale allometrically with mass as two-thirds.
The form of an organism has a close linkage to its function, and the relationship is important in the organisms whose individual form is highly flexible. The modular organisms consist of repeated building blocks which may be reflected in the ability of a colony to reallocate priority of resource transport among its units. For the social insect colonies as well as individual animals, the rate of biological processes scales with the body size.
Metabolic integration:
The extent to which parts of a colonial organism are physically or physiologically integrated influences the pattern of metabolic scaling. When modules are physiologically similar and independent, the entire colony metabolic rate is expected to be the product of the metabolic rate per module and the total number of modules and hence scale isometrically.
Modules are not typically co-dependent as tissue and organs are in unitary organisms; however, the more the modules become physiologically dependent on each other, the more the relationship scale allometrically similar to unitary organisms. Resource-transport systems are a significant element of colonial integration that is critical in understanding variation in metabolic scaling. Various benefits emerge from the internal metabolic integration and include the sharing of resources throughout the organism, enhance an expectation for integration to take place in modular animals under several conditions despite the costs. The evolution of transport systems is a central component in the evolution of multicellularity in animals (Parrin et.al., 2010).
 The power of metabolic allometry in ecology derives from the diversity of life exhibiting a non-linear scaling pattern in which the metabolic rates are not proportional to mass (Agutter & Wheatley, 2004). One theory postulates that the supply of energy is a significant physiological constraint and another postulate that behavior regulates the demand for energy. There is the likelihood that the increase in colony size reduces the proportion of individual active engagement for scaling at a colony level. Some colonies exhibit a hypometria allometry in which exponent < 1(Agutter & Wheatley, 2004).
            Colonies can live in different states comprised of loose, highly integrated, or a transition to a fully integrated individual. The highly integrated colonies have a high likelihood of exhibiting standard metabolic scaling (with exponent = ¾) as the case in the fully integrated individuals when measured at resting metabolic rate(Siblyet.al., 2012). 
Testing theories:
In modular animals, the expectations and consequences for metabolic isometry are precise; however, there are many reasons to expect varying scaling exponents that deviate from isometry. Various scaling exponents have emerged for modular animals, together with a more detailed explanation of the biology of modular organisms. The representation of modular growth has always been the perpetual addition of identical units.  However, when modules within colonies vary in size and shape, modules still vary as a result of differences in age, ontogeny, reproductive state, nutritional state, and position. The degree of increase of respiration of an entire colony together with the number of modules added will, hence, be dependent on the particular arrangement, integration and functional responsibility of individual modules influencing the uptake and utilization of energy. The differences among genotypes, growth forms, and species in the aspect of variation that takes place among modules and during the lifetime of an individual is likely a great source of information concerning the limitation or enhancing of variation surface area, volume ratio of the transport system in metabolic scaling. This variability is sometimes biologically critical rather than being noise and offers a great chance to understand the causes and impacts of metabolic scaling. The interest of metabolic scaling in modular animals also can be attributed to the aspects of these organisms that allow differentiation among theories, since it is possible to artificially manipulate body mass, size and shape. The predictions of b for competing for mechanistic theories are similar, and it is necessary to use manipulative experiments of size and oxygen metabolism to determine the cause and consequence relationships between body mass and metabolic rate (White & Kearney, 2014).
Hypothesis
            More integrated colonies have metabolic scaling exponents of 0.75 in the resting state and less integrated colonies have a higher exponent and no clear resting state.
Study species and culture conditions:
     Colonies are explanted as two-polyp fragments and grown on 12 mm diameter and cover glassto larger and smaller sizes. Colonies grow to reach the edge of the cover glass nearly, for the larger sizes. Some colonies grow as small part of the edge of the cover glass, for the smaller sizes, and the assays are done 3 h or 24 h after feeding. Colonies of Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus and Sympodium sp. are used. The growth of the colonies was limited to one side of the coverslip.
            Sympodium sp. can be either blue or green and grows in reefs and shallow lagoons of the ocean. They are a fast-growing, sheet-like species that colonize or encrust the rocks and shells on which they grow. They are widely available due to fast growth and adaptability to the aquarium environment. They get most of their nutrients through symbiotic algae (zooxanthellae) contained within the coral. They can also do well when they receive nutrients from phyto-plankton filtered from the water currents but are not directly fed.  Their gastrovascular fluid is driven by ciliary action (Harmata et.al., 2013).  Sympodium sp. is cultured at 27° C, dKH 9, pH 8.2, specific gravity 1.026.
            Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus are among the many hydractinia species that are widely known. Hydractinia feed on smaller invertebrates found in the shallow mud, but in laboratory environments, they feed on brine shrimp. They consist of a network of gastrovascular canals in a plate of tissue called the stolonal mat.  Large polyps in the center of the colony feed and then, using myo-epithelial contractions, pump gastrovascular fluid to the growing peripheral zone of the colony.Hydractinia is cultured at 20.5° C, dKH 9, pH 8.2, specific gravity 1.021.
Materials and Methods
Study Species and Culture conditions for Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus and sympodium sp.
            All the experiments will be carried out using single clone of each of the hydractinia symbiolongicarpus and sympodium sp. H. symbiolongicarpus are sheet-like due to the formation of a stolonal mat in the initial stages of development and produce varying amounts of peripheral stolons.
            The colonies will be cultured at ~20.5 °C on 15-mm round glass cover slips suspended in floating racks in an aquarium having Reef Crystals artificial sea water with 32% salinity and under gravel filtrations illuminated for 12 hours per day. The water will be changed on a weekly basis and colonies fed to repletion three times a week with 3-day-old brine shrimp. The replicate colonies will be produced by explanting 1-3 polyps surgically and connecting the tissue from a source colony to the cover slips. Explants will be held in place using nylon threads fastened to the cover slip by aquarium glue. After the explants are attached to the cover slips, they begin to grow into small colonies and the threads and glue removed. The cover slips will be cleaned twice weekly on the non-feeding days by use of a paint-brush. Additionally, colony growth will be restricted to one side of the cover slip by scrapping the stolons from the reverse side with a razor blade. The experiments will be carried out at ~20.5 °C in culture aquariums except when kept in glass finger bowls in incubators (Harmata & Blackstone, 2011).


The general imaging protocols
            For the experiments to be conducted, the images will be acquired and analyzed using Image-Pro Plus software. Whole-colony images will be acquired with a Hamamatsu Ocra-100 cooled CCD camera attached to a macro lens. For the images of mitochondrion-rich cells and that of gastro vascular cavity, the camera will be attached to a Zeiss Axiovert 135 inverted microscope. The colonies will be imaged in seawater in disposable chambers with frequent water changes for temperature maintenance. All the statistical analysis will be performed using PC-SAS software.          
            The experiment will also be performed on the colonies of sympodium sp. which will be grown and studied in the lab. They are symbiotic-containing octocorals that belong to the Holaxonia-Alcyoniina clade of octocorals. Sympodium sp. belongs to the family Xeniidae. In regard to thermal and light perturbation, the symbionants leave the tissue and accumulate in the lumen of the gastrovascular system. The sensitivity of sympodium sp. to thermal perturbation is relative but not as high as that of Sarcothelia sp.
            The control and treated colonies will be explanted from the same mother colony for each of the experiments. The experimental colonies will be grown on 12 mm and 15 mm round cover glass and cultured using the standard methods. The conditions for culturing include; 27 °C, 1.026 specific gravity, 8.2 pH, 400 ppm calcium, 1200 ppm magnesium, 0 ppm nitrate and 12 h dark, 8 h illumination at 30 µmol photons m-2 s-1, 4 h illumination at 110 μmol photons m-2 s-1. Only fresh materials will be used for the experiment and the colonies will be grown on the cover glass 1 to 2 weeks before use.


Measures of oxygen uptake rate and data analysis
            The rate of oxygen uptake is assayed in colonies using Strathkelvin Instruments oxygen meter. The oxygen uptake measurement is taken in a 3-minute span for over 30 minutes in the dark. Slopes of linear regression versus time is used to calculate metabolic rate (mg O2 L-1 min-1), which then serves as the outcome for regressions using size as the predictor.  Colonies of the two species will be tested on feeding and non-feeding days.  It is expected that this will affect metabolic rate in Hydractinia, but not in Sympodium, since the latter are not fed. To gain further insight into the metabolic state of these species, experiments on oxygen metabolism and mass will examine starved colonies (minimum metabolic rate) and uncoupled colonies (maximum metabolic rate).
Measurement of oxygen metabolism
            Oxygen generation can be helpful in the determination of the health of colonies and the assessment of whether photo systems are functioning correctly. The net oxygen consumption is observed in the dark due to respiration whereas the net oxygen production takes place in exposure to light due to photosynthesis. The use of an inhibitor, DCMU, to block photo system II makes oxygen metabolism in the light to resemble that in the dark (Netherton, Scheer, Morrison, Parrin & Blackstone, 2014).
            Strathkelvin 1302 electrode and 781-oxygen meter in a glass chamber will be used to measure dissolved oxygen. A Neslab RTE-100D recirculating chiller operating at 27º C will help to maintain a constant temperature. The colonies of sympodium sp. will be grown on 12 mm diameter round cover glass to fit in the 13 mm diameter glass chamber. A magnet will be attached at the back of another 12 mm cover glass for stirring having a drop of silicone grease to the cover glass on which the colony resides. The oxygen uptake readings will be recorded for 21 minutes in total in the dark and 21 minutes in the light in 1 mL. seawater with 12.5 μL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The process will then be repeated in 1 mL. Sea water with 12.5 μL from a stock solution of 0.008 mol L-1 DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea) dissolved in DMSO to a final concentration of 100 μmol L-1. Five colonies will be used to measure oxygen metabolism. For each colony, the slope of oxygen concentration versus time will be calculated for the untreated colony in the light as well as in the dark and for the same colony treated with DCMU in the light and the dark. The slopes will be averaged and pair comparison t-test performed. The mean slope in light for the control experiment will be compared to the average slope in the light for the treated colonies and the average slop in the dark for the controls compared to that in the dark of the treated colonies.   
Protein assay
            The size of small, experimental colonies size can be measured by total protein (Agutter & Wheatley, 2004).  The relationship between total protein and mass can be determined for larger colonies and extrapolated to small sizes. Bradford protein assay is an analytical procedure used to measure the concentration of protein in a solution. The assay relies on the observation that the absorbance maximum for an acidic solution of Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 changes from 465 nm to 595 nm when protein binding occurs. The hydrophobic and ionic interactions cause stabilization of the anionic dye shown by a visible color change (Ku et.al., 2013). Total protein compares absorbance of sample to a standard to determine total protein and hence size.
CBTM Protein Assay
            An improved Coomassie Dye based protein assay is based on the Bradford Protein Assay. The assay is appropriate for the simple and fast estimation of the protein concentration. The assay has a basis on a single Coomassie dye based reagent. The binding of the protein to the dye results to a change in color from brown to blue. The change in the color is proportional to the protein concentration and protein estimation is performed using little protein.  The CB Protein Assay uses a simple protocol and ready to use reagents that do not require pre-filtering or dilution. The procedure involves simple mixing of the protein solution with CB Protein Dye and reading the optical density. The protein-dye complexes attain a stable end point within 5 minutes, and the CB protein Assay method is compatible with the reducing agents and various laboratory agents. The assay has a traditional bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein standard or non-animal protein standard. DMSO at a concentration of 10 % is compatible with the CB protein assay, hence will be appropriate for the protein assay experiment involving the colonial animals. The method is highly sensitive, has a flexible protocol, is ready to use the assay reagents without any preparation, and has a long shelf life up to 12 months of stability.  
References
Agutter, P. S. & Tuszynski, J. A. (2011). Analytic theories of allometric scaling. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 1055-1062
Agutter, P. S., & Wheatley, D. N. (2004). Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy?. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 1(1), 1
Chance, B., & Williams, G. R. (1956): The respiratory chain and oxidative phosphorylation. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol, 17, 65-134.
Farrell-Gray, C. C., & Gotelli, N. J. (2005). Allometric exponents support a 3/4power scaling law. Ecology, 86(8), 2083-2087.
Glazier, D. S. (2014). Metabolic scaling in complex living systems: Systems, 2(4), 451-540.
Hartikainen, H., Humphries, S., & Okamura, B. (2014). Form and metabolic scaling in colonial animals: Journal of Experimental Biology, 217(5), 779-786.
Harmata, K. L., Blackstone, N. (2011). Reactive oxygen species and the regulation of hyperproliferation in a colonial hydroid: Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 84, 481-493.
Hulbert, A. J. (2014). A sceptics view: “Kleiber’s Law” or the “3/4 Rule” is neither a law nor a rule but rather an empirical approximation. Systems, 2(2), 186-202.
Ku, H., Lim, H., Oh, K., Yang, H., Jeong, J., & Kim, S. (2013). Interpretation of protein   quantitation using the Bradford Assay: Comparison with two calculation models. Analytical Biochemistry, 434(1), 178-180. doi:10.1016/j.ab.2012.10.045.
Netherton S.E., Scheer D.M., Morrison P.R., Parrin A.P. & Blackstone N.W. (2014)          Physiological correlates of symbiont migration during bleaching of two octocoral species:         The Journal of Experimental Biology 217; 1496-1477, doi:10.1242/jeb.095414
Parrin, A. P., Netherton, S. E., Bross, L. S., McFadden, C. S., & Blackstone, N. W. (2010): Circulation of fluids in the gastrovascular system of a stoloniferan octocoral. The Biological Bulletin, 219(2), 112-121.
Ponczek, L. M., & Blackstone, N. W. (2001): Effect of cloning rate on fitness-related traits in two marine hydroids. The Biological Bulletin, 201(1), 76-83.
Rogers, C. L., & Thomas, M. B. (2001) Calcification in the Planula and Polyp of the Hydroid       Hydractinia Symbiolongicarpus: Journal of Experimental Biology, 204(15), 2657.
Sibly, R. M., J. H. Brown, and A. Kodric-Brown (2012). Metabolic ecology: A scaling approach. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781119968535
Waters, J. S. (2012). Metabolic and behavioral integration in social insect colonies: Arizona State University
White, C. R., & Kearney, M. R. (2014). Metabolic scaling in animals: methods, empirical results, and theoretical explanations. Comprehensive Physiology, 231-232.
White, C. R., Kearney, M. R., Matthews, P. G., Kooijman, S. A., & Marshall, D. J. (2011) A manipulative test of competing theories for metabolic scaling: The American Naturalist, 178(6), 746-7.

Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in nursing essay help USA if you need a similar paper you can place your order from custom college papers.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Buy thesis Online for Cheap

We are keen on ensuring that, any time students Buy thesis Online papers from our website, they get good grades that align with their expec...