Compare and contrast two out of the three Japanese colonies

What were the specific ideas and institutions implicated in the control of these territories

The close location of Taiwan and wartime Korea contributed to major interests for Japan to seize them. There was a high possibility of having the ability to sustain political and military control over Taiwan and wartime Korea.  There existed longer supply lines to the colonies that were endured by some Western powers. Another issue that played a major role was the availability of security concerns as well as the roles played by Japan in the choice of early colonies. According to Japan the position of Taiwan and wartime Korea within the peninsula was in the best position and strategically located for functions involving attaining total control over the two colonies. The colonies were also culturally close whereby they shared most of the cultural beliefs. The two countries were highly populated many people. The most of the individuals shared practices such as Chinese literacy, cultural practices, and religious beliefs such as Chinese ideograms religion, Confucianism believes, and Greater Vehicle Buddhism believes (Nakano, 2009). The fertility of the two countries contributed to the interests and desire for Japanese to establish their governance.

According to Japan forms of government, they came to possess as well as treat its two colonies in very different terms. As a result of differences in forces over Taiwan, it was taken by Japan from China as a result of the Sino-Japanese war. Later Taiwan went from one foreign occupier to another. In Korea, Japan rulers took control for a long period whereby they made use of agents within the Korea (Ikeda, Asato, Aya, and Ming, 2013). The governing using agents was meant to weaken the Korean Imperial rule and replace it with a set of ground treaties of annexation. They were Unfair Treaties that targeted at proclaiming Korea as part of Japan.

The Similarities

Taiwan and wartime Korea were strategically positioned. The location was near their colony. They also shared common cultural practices, religious believes, and common form of education.  Both areas had many small land-owning farmers. Both Taiwan and  Korea became Japanese colonies in the in almost same time during the prewar period. According to analysis, both had close political and economic ties to the United States (US) in the postwar period (Kratoska, Paul, 2005).

The Differences

Korea was more secure compared to Taiwan. Moreover, Korea has been illustrated as a colony whose respective economic growth was higher regarding development in both pre and postwar periods. It is clear that, although both Taiwan and  Korea economies were industrialized during the colonial period, Korea was much more developed. Korea economic structure was characterized by well industrialized and balanced regarding food and industries. However, Taiwan was more biased and concentrated towards food products and food processing. The interest on Taiwan was based on the presence of tropical regions with bountiful natural resources. The interests of was influenced by possible to doubling rice planting. Other crops such as sugar canes, tea, camphor, banana, pineapple, were naturally found in plenty. The fact made it possible for colonial power interests to occur as well as fast agricultural growth and development. Therefore much of the Taiwanese colonial era industrialization was highly concentrated in industries involved in processing agricultural products (Kratoska, Paul, 2005). In Taiwan, the regions that existed between the island and the mainland were mainly settled by farmers. The scheduled plan involved farmers who planted and tilled pristine ground during the spring as well as summer months before retiring to their homes on the mainland during winter

And finally, what was the overarching socio-economic function of racism in each case

The form of governance that was exercised in Taiwan and wartime Korea was characterized by forms of discrimination and partly assimilation. Such form of governance is part simplifications of a complicated life and colonial oppression between Japan and its colonies. The post-war factors have contributed to the differences in feelings that have taken over the Taiwan and Korean lands (Nakano, 2009). Through threats against Taiwan and Korean enhanced through war, there were differences in the treatment and exercise of policies to different groups of people.

The Japanese government had formulated policies which allowed Japanese to take over Taiwan and Korean land. Due to the strategic plan for acquiring their land, many Taiwan and Korean citizens were forced to worked as tenants on Japanese grabbed farms (Sawai, 2016). They were forced to believe that they were working on the same land as their ancestors. Some of the techniques applied to occupy the lands in Korea and Taiwan included an encouragement of emigration from the overcrowded lands in Japan. The technique resulted in thousands of Japanese farmers moving to and taking over Taiwan and Korean lands.

Similarities

In both colonies, Japanese functions were pushed to ensure that Korea and Taiwan were part of Japan by making them believe that there was once a Japanese colony in those territories much earlier times. Initially, the colonization of Taiwan and Korea was characterized by the presence of a fair use of the local rule that was given to the Taiwanese. However, Korean and Taiwan citizens were required to be loyal to Japan. The local affairs were only allowed to be handled by local people. The Japanese applied various techniques to bring social balances. Some of the techniques applied included attempts by the Japanese to assimilate Taiwan and Koreans. However, the process was less sensible and oppressive since the Japanese government required all Taiwan and Korean citizens to register with Japanese names. Those who were assimilated were required to possess Japanese names to make them full citizens and enjoy equal opportunities as Japanese. According to their policies, they were defined as individuals with rights to kill and having rights to make life on various individuals who opposed or agreed with Japanese governance.

Differences

In Taiwan, the Japanese set up a different model of a colonial governance system that was almost similar to that applied by Western powers in their colonies. The governance leads to building up a separate class of Taiwanese bureaucrats who were selected to provide a local face that represented the colonial rulers.  However, since Korea was then considered as a Japanese territory, the governing body in Korea had much more Japanese characteristics. The Japanese military was used more aggressively to rule, command and enforce law and order. Even though there were several attempts imposed to ensure that there was equality among the colonies, the general treatment of Korea and Koreans during the reign of Kato Hiroyuki was worse than that of the Taiwanese by the Japanese (Ikeda, Asato, Aya, and Ming, 2013).

References

Ikeda, Asato, Aya Louisa Mcdonald, and Ming Tiampo. 2013. Art and war in Japan and its empire, 1931-1960.

Kratoska, Paul H. 2005. Asian labor in the wartime Japanese empire: unknown histories. Armonk, N.Y.: Sharpe.

Nakano, Yoichi. 2009. Japan’s wartime use of colonial labor: Taiwan and Korea (1937-1945). 

Sawai, Minoru. 2016. Economic activities under the Japanese colonial empire. 

Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in custom nursing papers if you need a similar paper you can place your order from custom nursing essay.