Confidence
intervals (CIs) are values in calculations from the observed data that most
likely contain the real value of a given probability. The investigators choose
the possibility. The classical significance testing relies on the p values to
provide a statically significant result or the dichotomous result or not. By
limiting the research findings, interpretation of the p values means that
researchers can either underestimate or overestimate the meaning of results.
The main aim of clinical research is to place trial on an intervention with the
aim that the results from the sample will be generalizable to the larger
population. On its own the p values lack no information of the overall meaning
and importance of results in clinical practices (Connelly, 2013).
They
do not also show what may happen in the general population or the future.
Therefore, clinical significance is the decision derived from the practical
relevance or value of a specific treatment and this may not or may involve a
statistical significance as one of the criteria. Confidence intervals are one
way in which the researchers can assist in deciding whether a statistical
result has relevance in piracies or whether it is significant or not.
Confidence interval has clinical significance since it may prove that the
minimal improvement in percentages and that points out where a clinician has to
determine if there is a benefit of changing the treatment (Chamberlain College
of Nursing, 2014).
A controversial situation is when a patient
comes to the ICU experiencing the spontaneous hemorrhagic stroke. After talking
to his family, they told me that the patient chooses to be part of a research
study on aortic valve replacements that requires no open-heart surgery.
The
patient was aware of the higher risk of stroke in this new method, unlike the
open-heart surgery. The physician also felt that the patient would not agree
with and open-heart surgery. In this case, the patient chooses to proceed with
this high-risk method despite the lack of statistical data. Ultimately the
patient enjoyed another six healthy months after performing this procedure. In
such an incidence, the patient and family made use of the clinical significance
in justifying their decisions, and they were happy with the patients’ outcome
for six months despite finally suffering from a terminal stroke.
References
Chamberlain College of Nursing, (2014). NR500 Foundational Concepts &
Applications: Week 5 lesson. St. Louis, Mo: online publication.
Connelly, L. M. (2013). What Are Confidence
Intervals? MEDSURG Nursing, 22(1), 56
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in write my research paper cheap if you need a similar paper you can place your order for buy custom essay papers online.
No comments:
Post a Comment