1.
Based on the available information,
Atlanta offers the best distribution center in the covering of the southeastern
region. The assessment of both the horizontal as well as the vertical grid
values indicates that Atlanta has 1400 horizontal and 600 hundred vertical grid
values respectively. These grid points offer the closest location to the
southeastern region that the company is targeting. The only limitation to this
selection is the fact that the solution presents an optimum solution for just a
unitary point in time (Coyle, 2009). The additional factors
to take into consideration encompass the variation in the volumes that the
company experiences, also whether there are any changes to the transportation
rates. Additionally, it is necessary for the company to addresses issues such
as the availability of the raw material along with the location of the markets.
The selection of the grid is additionally dependent on the transportation costs
remaining constant; although there are certain factors that can make these
rates vary. In this case, the assessment of the grid makes it possible for one
to establish that Atlanta is closest to the target location. Additionally, the
application of the grid technique for the analysis offers a good starting point
although it is imperative that other factors are taken into consideration in the
making of the final decision (Coyle, 2009). These should encompass
the projection of the industry’s future, transit privileges, transportation
rates, commercial zones, foreign trade along with the tampering rates. About
the selection of Atlanta as the choice, it is currently the best distribution
site for numerous local, regional as global companies. Statistics indicate that
Atlanta offers excellent market access to diverse destinations across the US
and the rest of the world. Atlanta is the contemporary distribution hub
boasting of highly developed infrastructure as railway, airports, ports as well
as the highways. If the company decides to take their products to the global
market, Atlanta is strategically located, being closest to Savannah, the fourth
largest container port in the US. The company’s products can be shipped via
truck to approximately 80% of the US in just two days, in addition to the fact
that Atlanta has constantly been described as being one of the biggest inland
ports in the globe (Coyle, 2009).
The fact that the
infrastructure is already available in Atlanta and that it has the least cost
center of the grid, it is my perception that retaining the distribution center
in Atlanta offers the company with the most reasonable decision.
2.
With the projection of the growth in the
transportation, I believe that the south coast region is not going to be
impacted adversely. The rationale behind this conclusion is the fact that since
Atlanta strategically located to the region and that the infrastructure is
already available; the company will just select an alternative transportation
model that offers the least charges. The most applicable option to transport
the products to the south coast market would be via the rail instead of trucks.
3.
I believe that the market growth in
Raleigh/ Durham is going to be a good thing for Atlanta. The rationale behind
this assertion is the fact that the relocation of some of the distribution
functions to Allentown will reduce the burden that Atlanta had in delivering up
north. Thus, Atlanta is going to be able to successfully serve the markets on
the south coast for more conveniently and satisfactorily.
References
Coyle,
J. (2009). Supply Chain Management, A
Logistics Perspective (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western
Cengage Learning
Sherry Roberts is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in best custom research papers if you need a similar paper you can place your order for custom college essay services.
No comments:
Post a Comment