Increasing
figures of young children with diagnosed disabilities
and exceptional learning needs are enrolled in early childhood programs. If early childhood
program is to be a fruitful educational approach, it is crucial that all early childhood teachers understand and
are able to offer individualized teaching to young children with special needs. This
article describes teaching strategies that preschool teachers can use to advocate the learning
needs of all kids with whom they
work, as well as young children with disabilities and special
needs. The author,
Mary Boat discusses the process of individualizing instruction,
which consists of four primary steps.
(1) Get to know each child's needs,
interests and abilities. (2) Create opportunities for education that build on children's interests. (3) Scaffold children's learning through helpful interactions (4) monitor children's development toward achieving meaningful goals (Mary Boat et al.
2010)
Get to know each child
Most
children are naturally curious about their environment and eagerly participate
in learning activities. However, for some
children it is difficult to identify what motivates them to be wholly engaged. Teachers
who pay concentration
to what kids do and say
can usually discover what motives them. This is true for all
kids, but even
more so for
children with physical and psychological disabilities because they may not exhibit the similar kinds
of characters as their peers.
Teachers who work successfully with children who have
disabilities or special needs are attentive in identifying child’s interest by cooperating with families and other service
providers of education (Mary Boat et al. 2010)
Scaffold to support
learning
When
teachers hold up knowledge, the objective
is to determine what type and intensity
of support will be most useful to individual children. A teacher’s understandable glance may draw one child’s attention to an appropriate behavior. Another child may require a verbal reminder
yet another child may benefit from explicit instruction or examples of affirmative
conduct. One child may follow when the
teacher shows how to hold scissors correctly to cut paper
while another one may require hand
over hand support to do the similar
activity. In all likelihood, children only need support
for a short term (Mary Boat et al. 2010)
The
components are interconnected and
form the framework
for decision making around individualization. To successfully
create attractive learning opportunities for children teachers
must know what children value and
enjoy. Also what children are capable of doing and
what parents can and should expect from each child. Teachers
who know about the children create
learning opportunities based
on that information and support their learning through instructional tactics that promote growth. Experienced
teachers determine whether children are making suitable progress
toward achieving goals by monitoring progress and using that
information to change
instructional tactics and intensity
as appropriate (Mary Boat et al. 2010)
The Council for
Exceptional Children
The New IDEA
Bill
On
19th November, 2004, Congress passed milestone legislation to
reauthorize the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act. The passage of
this historic law follows three years of growth. From the initial public
forums held by the Department of Education’s of Special Education and Rehabilitative services in the month of October 2011 to the bargains between the House- Senate conference committee, So as to settle the differences
between their bills in the fall of 2004. In between, the House
of Representatives passed its bill
in April of the year 2003 while the Senate passed
its law in May of 2004 (Smith, 2008). On September 21,
2004, the Senate elected
conferees to the IDEA conference committee, and almost three weeks
later the House followed suit and
elected its conferees to the conference committee on October 8. The conference committee
began discussions and negotiations in October of 2004
and reported the cooperation bill
H.R. 1350, which both chambers
approved, on November 19. The
President is expected to sign
the new IDEA
bill into law soon (Council for special Children, 2014)
CEC’S
IDEA Reauthorization Activities
Before
the introduction of the House and Senate
reauthorization bills, CEC participated
in a range of activities in preparation for the
reauthorization process. In addition
to giving the CEC IDEA Reauthorization Recommendations paper,
CEC organized and continued to guide an IDEA reauthorization work group, involving representatives
from disability, family, and general education
associations. The goal was to create
agreement among these groups wherever possible,
or at least, to create awareness of the diverse opinions
and positions that exist among these groups. CEC staff also worked directly
with key members of the House and Senate Education
Committees, providing information
and serving to craft legislative language (Smith, 2008). Through IDEA
reauthorization and other ways, CEC continues to advocate for improved
working surroundings for all special educators
and improved outcome for children
and youth with disabilities and their families. CEC will offer continuous exploration of the IDEA to its members
over the next several weeks (Council for special
Children, 2014)
The
implications of the requirements for CEC members and all
practicing special educators in far too
many cases will result in conditions that are technical and invasive (Smith, 2008).
However, impractical or unsound the
countless of consequences, they are becoming law at least at the
present, and CEC members will need to assess their individual circumstances in light of the requirements. CEC members in leadership positions will require being watchful to the pressures to lower
licensing requirements in order to meet requirements
for what the
law describes as “highly qualified” exceptional educators. In addition, members must advocate for exact
alternative preparation programs. Finally, CEC members expected to be at the table when
their State develops plans for implementation of this provision (Klingner et al. 2014)
Reference
Council
for special Children:
Standards for Evidence-Based Practices in Special
Education. (2014). Exceptional Children, 80(4),
504-511.
Evidence-Based
exceptional Education in the
Context of Scarce Evidence-Based Practices: The Council for
Exceptional Children’s Interdivisional Research Group. (2014). Teaching Exceptional Children, 47(2), 81-84.
Klingner,
J. K., Boelé, A., Linan-Thompson, S., & Rodriguez, D. (2014) Essential Components of Special Education for
English Language Learners with Learning Disabilities: Position Statement of the Division for Learning
Disabilities of the Council for
Exceptional Children Learning Disabilities Research
& Practice (Wiley-Blackwell), 29(3), 93-96
Mary
B. Boat, Laurie A. Dinnebeil, and Youlmi Bae, (2010) Dimensions of Early
Childhood, winter, vol. 38, no. 1
Smith,
D. W. (2008). 2008 Council for Exceptional Children
Convention; April 2-5, 2008; Boston, Massachusetts Journal
of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102(5), 307-310.
Carolyn Morgan is the author of this paper. A senior editor at MeldaResearch.Com in write my nursing research paper services. If you need a similar paper you can place your order from essay already written services.
No comments:
Post a Comment